måndag 13 oktober 2014

Reflection after Theme 5

This weeks lectures got rescheduled so it feels a bit divided and far apart. So now we've already read and handed in the 6th theme but we still have the last lecture for theme 5 (with Haibo Li) this afternoon.

First of, sadly I don’t know if I learnt so much from the first lecture. I was a bit disappointed actually. I think her texts were really interesting and I have talked a lot about them with both family, friends and fellow students. But the lecture was more of a recap of the articles, so it didn't really feel like it mattered if one had read them or not, and I didn't get so much further understanding of the theme from going to the lecture - it felt a bit redundant so to speak. But maybe it was my anticipations that were too high?

However, she talked about how the research design affects the research which I hope that Haibo also might talk a bit more about today! She sometimes had to train participants in her research for the tasks that they were supposed to test, so they were acquainted with the system before doing the task. But then she argued that they might need other participants for other tasks in the research and then they needed to give them some start up training in the system as well. The result will probably be different if using the same participants for all the tasks, compared to if using different participants for different tasks. Which method to use is of course then depending on the research.


Haibo Li’s lecture was really inspiring, as usual! He talked about getting from an idea to a prototype or product. To do this he had five bullet points:
  • How to come up with an idea? 
  • How to filter the ideas? 
  • How to validate an idea?
  • How to evaluate an idea?
  • How to communicate your idea?
He also talked about problem solving, and that it’s equally important to define the problem as it is actually solving it. You can find much easier solutions with a good definition of the problem. However, we are often locked to our "usual" problem solving methods so it might be hard to look outside the box for the most simple solutions.

Finally, Haibo talked about that even when you have defined your problem, you have found a solution, you have validated it through proof of concept and evaluated some prototypes or so on. But then you need to communicate the idea! It is as important as the other steps and you then need to show that you care about customer satisfaction. You should be able to explain in what way your product do so as fast as the doors of an elevator opens and closes (the elevator pitch).

We also watched the first 3 minutes of this clip to get an understanding of what problem solving can be, and that there are several solutions to all obstacles.

5 kommentarer:

  1. Hi,

    I agree with you that Sallnäs' lecture mostly was a repetition of her texts. I felt that we either could have read the texts or attended to her lecture, which I don't think is the purpose with the lectures. I think that the texts we are asked to read every week have the purpose to give us a basic knowledge of the theme, while the lectures and seminars should go deeper into the subject (or have another viewpoint on it) and give us further understanding of the theme.

    I believe that Sallnäs' lecture would have been so much more rewarding for us if she talked more about design research in general. I would personally have liked if she taught us some "dos and dont's" and gave us some useful general tips in what to think about when working with design research.

    SvaraRadera
    Svar
    1. Thank you for commenting on my post! :)
      I also think the lectures (or even more the seminars) are supposed to build new knowledge from the texts and not only repeat them or so on. It would have been more interesting to use the texts as a tool for explaining how the theories/methods of design research is done, as previous seminar leaders have tried to do! :)

      But I think this week was a good one anyway, with the inspiring final of Haibo Li! :)

      Radera
  2. Excellent, thoughtful comments.

    Leif

    SvaraRadera
  3. Hi Malin,

    I liked Haibos lecture aswell, and i agree that it might be equally important (if not even more important) to define the problem as solving it. I think that there is a possibility that you often get stuck in your own way of doing things and therefore have a hard time adapting and "thinking outside the box". The most beautiful solutions are often the simplest ones, i guess that this is very important for our future work as engineers!

    SvaraRadera
  4. Hi Malin,
    I really like your post reflection from this week its informative and reflecting in the same time! I also understood the importance of defining a problem before trying to solve it. Haibo talked a lot about putting a lot more effort in the defining part. But I’m thinking of if that could be depending on what kind of problem or research you are doing? Sometimes it might be very easy to define a problem?

    SvaraRadera